bord | |
kontrakt |
izv. |
ataka |
štih. |
rezultat |
MP / %
|
∑ |
9 |
Kotanyi - Elias
(7)
|
5 x |
S |
|
-2 |
| 300 |
13,88% |
13,88% |
10 |
Kotanyi - Elias
(7)
|
2 |
S |
|
+1 |
140 |
|
45,50% |
29,69% |
11 |
Richter - Alfirev
(11)
|
2 |
E |
|
+2 |
| 170 |
13,88% |
24,42% |
12 |
Richter - Alfirev
(11)
|
2 |
S |
|
= |
90 |
|
63,54% |
34,20% |
13 |
Škreblin - Urli
(19)
|
2 |
N |
|
= |
110 |
|
18,42% |
31,04% |
14 |
Škreblin - Urli
(19)
|
3 |
E |
|
-2 |
100 |
|
72,58% |
37,97% |
15 |
Karaman Martinović - N.Čaklović
(8)
|
2 NT |
W |
|
= |
| 120 |
9,38% |
33,88% |
16 |
Karaman Martinović - N.Čaklović
(8)
|
3 NT |
W |
|
+3 |
| 690 |
63,54% |
37,59% |
17 |
Janowski - Pajak
(3)
|
4 |
N |
|
+1 |
450 |
|
59,04% |
39,97% |
18 |
Janowski - Pajak
(3)
|
5 x |
E |
|
-4 |
800 |
|
63,54% |
42,33% |
19 |
Mašić - S.Bjedov
(18)
|
6 NT |
S |
|
= |
990 |
|
77,08% |
45,49% |
20 |
Mašić - S.Bjedov
(18)
|
4 |
N |
|
-1 |
| 100 |
36,46% |
44,74% |
21 |
M.Muller - Eržić
(25)
|
1 |
N |
|
+2 |
140 |
|
77,08% |
47,22% |
22 |
M.Muller - Eržić
(25)
|
4 |
W |
|
-2 |
200 |
|
99,67% |
50,97% |
23 |
G.Muller - Kauzlarić
(13)
|
3 NT |
W |
|
+1 |
| 630 |
18,42% |
48,80% |
24 |
G.Muller - Kauzlarić
(13)
|
4 |
S |
|
+1 |
450 |
|
40,96% |
48,31% |
25 |
Jeseničnik - Orač
(23)
|
1 |
E |
|
+1 |
| 110 |
13,88% |
46,28% |
26 |
Jeseničnik - Orač
(23)
|
4 x |
N |
|
= |
790 |
|
90,63% |
48,75% |
1 |
Teresinski - Zawislak
(14)
|
2 |
E |
|
+2 |
| 170 |
18,42% |
47,15% |
2 |
Teresinski - Zawislak
(14)
|
4 |
E |
|
-2 |
100 |
|
81,58% |
48,87% |
3 |
Čare - Ž.Bjedov
(12)
|
4 |
S |
|
-1 |
| 50 |
40,96% |
48,50% |
4 |
Čare - Ž.Bjedov
(12)
|
4 |
E |
|
-1 |
100 |
|
81,58% |
50,00% |
5 |
Babić - Pintarić
(2)
|
4 |
N |
|
= |
620 |
|
59,04% |
50,39% |
6 |
Babić - Pintarić
(2)
|
3 NT |
S |
|
-1 |
| 50 |
18,42% |
49,06% |
7 |
Laszcak - Rutkowski
(1)
|
2 |
S |
|
= |
110 |
|
45,50% |
48,92% |
8 |
Laszcak - Rutkowski
(1)
|
3 NT |
W |
|
= |
| 400 |
36,46% |
48,44% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302,26 |
|